A tribute to and a lament for Marshall McLuhan continues. If he had lived Marshall would have been 100 on July 21, 2011. Join me in the countdown to his centennial, and an exploration of more of his observations on the way media work in the electric age in which we live.
Jokes
It took TV to really make the telephone’s stimulus pay off.
Marshall McLuhan (1964, age 52). Of course …
“In the 1920s, the telephone spawned a good deal of dialogue humour that sold as gramophone records. But radio and the talking pictures were not kind to the monologue, even when it was made by W.C. Fields or Will Rogers. These hot media pushed aside the cooler forms that TV has now brought back to a larger scale. The new race of nightclub entertainers (Newhart, Nichols and May) have a curious early-telephone flavor that is very welcome, indeed.”
Me (November, 2010, age 58). Is this where the internet has taken us?
Now we have a brand new race of entertainers turning the book into dialogue. Very welcome, indeed.
Cordially, Marshall and Me
Reading
Marshall McLuhan, Understanding Media, 1964, p. 270.
Is American humour the monopoly of uneducated rubes and yokels?
Me (October, 2010, age 58). The argumentative Dr. McLuhan .
Marshall McLuhan never backed away from an argument. In fact he seemed to be happiest when he was courting an argument by uttering an inflammatory opinion. Here he takes on the world of American speech, locating and characterizing it in less than flattering terms. While exceptions to his rule come to mind McLuhan seems to have managed to stake out a high ground of sorts. You of course must decide for yourself whether he’s right. Are uneducated rubes and yokels the masters of American humor and slang? Certainly, one could not be so assured about the rule of British slang and humor by British semi literates.
Consider this evidence found on you tube:
Marshall McLuhan (1964, age 52). Quite naturally …
“Permeation of the colloquial language with literate uniform qualities has flattened out educated speech till it is a very reasonable acoustic facsimile of the uniform and continuous visual effects of topography. From this technological effect follows the further fact that the humor, slang, and dramatic vigor of American-English speech are monopolies of the semi literate.”
Cordially, Marshall and Me
Reading
Marshall McLuhan, Understanding Media, 1964, p. 178.
What to do with Pastor Terry Jones?
Me (September, 2010, age 58). Marshall to the rescue.
Yesterday I asked for solutions to the Pastor Terry Jones problem. Here is some more specific guidance from Marshall McLuhan.
Marshall McLuhan (September, 2010, age 99). Jokes!
I hesitate to involve myself in earthly matters, however, you seem to be in need of help. I recall Walt Pittman asking me for a solution to the shameful “Paki” joke problem in Toronto in 1978. You may recall these racist jokes that blanketed the city at that time. (What do you say to a Pakistani with a Ferrari? Stop thief!) My solution was the obvious one – but the Metropolitan Toronto Council did nothing with the idea – launch a PR campaign to cover the city with a new brand of “Paki” jokes. Jokes that portray the Pakistani as a wholesome colourful character.
Jokes, I submit, are the easiest and most effective way of dealing with the Pastor Terry Jones problem. Simply cast him as an archetypal idiot by re-cycling sure-fire Newfie jokes. For example: What did Pastor Jones study at Harvard Medical School? (Nothing, they studied him.) What’s written on the bottom of Pastor Jones’s beer bottle? (Drink from other end.) What’s written on the top rung of Pastor Jones ladder? (Stop here.)
While we’re at it, one more, knee-slapper: How many preachers does it take to burn the Koran? Not a one. The media are capable of burning the Koran without anyone actually burning anything.
Cordially, Marshall and Me
Reading
See McLuhan’s solution to the Paki joke as recalled by Walter Pittman in Who Was Marshall McLuhan? pp. 112-113.
Still more suggestions for new Chapters of Understanding Media
Marshall McLuhan (August 2010, age 99). Is this funny?
Again? More joke titles for new chapters for Understanding Media? Now you’ve gone too far.
Me (September, 2010, age 58). You tell me.
Here are even more tongue-in-cheek suggestions for new chapters for Understanding Media:
Coronation Street: Ear’s to the Medium
Girdle: It’s a Cinch
White Out: A Step Backwards?
The Foreman Grill: Reversal of a Hot Medium
Telemarketing: Dollars and Sense
Financial Fraud: Give and Take?
Robin Hood: The Medieval Poor Man’s Credit Card
Megaphone: Old Yeller
White Wall Tires: Extensions of Spats
Flatulence: Wind at Your Back
Cordially, Marshall and Me
Reading
Marshall McLuhan, Understanding Media, 1964, pp. xi – xiii.
More suggestions for new Chapters for Understanding Media
Marshall McLuhan (August 2010, age 99). Is this funny?
Joke titles for new chapters for Understanding Media? Swift said, “satire is a glass in which we see every countenance but our own.” But really I fail to see the humor in this exercise.
Me (September, 2010, age 58) You tell me.
Here are some more tongue-in-cheek suggestions (See The Understanding Media Pun Contest) for new chapter topics and titles for Understanding Media:
Automatic Pencil: Getting the Lead Out
Pit Bull: Man’s Best Fiend
Microscope: Little Wonder
Smoke Signals: The Message is Blowing in the Wind
Quack-Quack: Fowl Language
Boring Conversation: Medium Tedium
Capital Punishment: A Live Issue?
Swedish Massage: The Masseuse is the Massage
Push-Up Bra: The Cleavage is the Message
Gypsy Fortune Teller: The Medium is the Message
George Hamilton: Narcissus as Narcosis
Cordially, Marshall and Me
Reading
Marshall McLuhan, Understanding Media, 1964, pp. xi – xiii.
The understanding media pun contest
Me (August, 2010, age 58). Pun.
Part II of Understanding Media contains 26 case studies, one for each letter of the alphabet. Each deals with a particular medium or technology. McLuhan delighted in puns and so it is not surprising to find puns in some of the titles of these chapters: for example “Clocks: The Scent of Time,” “Movies: The Reel World,” and “Automation: Learning a Living.”
Your challenge, should you decide to accept it is to come up with punning or joking chapter titles either for technologies that did not make it into Understanding Media or for chapters that did but for which McLuhan did not provide a punning subtitle.
For example, “Toasters: A Slice of Leaven,” “The Passenger Pigeon: A Bird in the Band,” “The Sun Dial: Tempus Fidgit.”
Marshall McLuhan (August 2010, age 99). I like a challenge
What about: “The Microscope: To see or not to see,” “Etch-a-sketch: Pane in the Ass,” or “Invisible Ink: The Write Stuff.”
Cordially, Marshall and Me
Reading
Marshall McLuhan, Understanding Media, 1964, pp.xi-xiii.
The McLuhan collection agency
Marshall McLuhan (1960s, age 50s). Ask and ye shall receive!
Today I sent a letter to a client who has not paid my speaking fee. I told them I felt like the parrot in the story who had been crossed with a tiger. “Polly want a cracker. AND I MEAN NOW!” I hope they got the message.
Me (August, 2010, age 58). I wonder
Perhaps only McLuhan would have sent letter like this. I’d like to think it did the trick. [For more on McLuhan's unique sense of humour]
Cordially, Marshall and Me
Reading
Philip Marchand, Marshall McLuhan: The medium and the messenger, 1989, p. 189.
Smile!
Marshall McLuhan (1966, age 54/55). A suggestion …
Tony Schwartz, the sound wizard, was telling me about his latest project. He was doctoring a tape recording of one of New York City Mayor Lindsay’s speeches.
“Marshall, the idea is to take out all his ‘ahs’ so he can hear how great he would sound if he didn’t use them. For example, in his speech Lindsay says: ‘It is ah … a great pleasure to be with you ah … tonight.’ Now listen to it without the ahs.”
No Tony I have a better idea. Why don’t you add a ‘hah’ after every ‘ah’ it will give the mayor’s speech the element of surprise!”
Me (July, 2010, age 57). A favourite anecdote
McLuhan liked to begin his speeches with terrible one-liners. For example, ‘cash is the poor man’s credit card,’ ‘a streaker is just a passing fanny,’ ‘he was never so humble but there’s no police like Holmes,’ ‘he lived as if each moment was his next,’ and ‘diaper backwards spells repaid, think about it.’ Humour ages quickly. Who knows at one time some of these may have been funny.
In his speaking McLuhan rarely used narrative-style jokes to make a point. He seems to have preferred to use one-liners to encourage the audience to be more open to the unexpected. There are however exceptions to this rule. In a speech apparently given at Johns Hopkins in the 1970s, he opens and closes the speech with traditional narrative-style jokes, both of which I think are still funny.
What is your favourite McLuhan joke? [search 'joke' on this blog for inspiration]
Cordially, Marshall and Me
Reading for this post
Barrington Nevitt with Maurice McLuhan, Who Was Marshall McLuhan? 1994, p. 190-191.
The 100 percent sensible Marshall McLuhan.
Marshall McLuhan (Spring 1971, age 59). McLuhan to Peter Newman
Did you hear about the man who went on a date with Siamese twins? The following day a friend asked him if he had a good time. The man’s reply: yes and no.
Me (June 2010, age 57). Two cheers for Marshall
Yesterday a small test was made of Patrick Watson’s observation made on “This Hour has Seven Days” that no one can understand more than 10 percent of what Marshall McLuhan has to say. The test of course was unscientific and leading rather than persuasive. Today I want to present a more sweeping assessment of McLuhan’s sensibility. Namely, that on unimportant subjects – that is subjects only tangentially related to media and media theory Marshall McLuhan is always easy to understand. For example here is McLuhan talking about his personal dislike of technical innovation and change on the CBC television program “This Hour Has Seven Days.” (May 6, 1966):
“I’m resolutely opposed to all innovation, all change. But I’m determined to understand what’s happening because I don’t choose to sit and let the juggernaut roll over me. Many people seem to think that because you talk about something recent you’re in favour of it. The exact opposite is true in my case. Anything I talk about is almost certainly something I’m resolutely against and it seems to me that the best way of opposing it is to understand it. Then you know where to turn off the button.”
What has this got to do with the man who dated Siamese twins? The punch line also works for the question: Do you understand what Marshall McLuhan is saying? Yes and no.
Cordially, Marshall and Me
Reading for this post
Who Was Marshall McLuhan, edited by Barrington Nevitt with Maurice McLuhan, 1995, pp. 109, 135, and 136.


