A tribute to and a lament for Marshall McLuhan. Five days a week, Tuesday through Saturday, I present one of McLuhanâs observations and talk about its relevance today. 300 ideas. 300 days. 300 posts.
Conversation
Me (September, 2010, age 58). Iâm walking home, minding my own business âŚ
I stop at the corner for the light. The guy beside me is on his cell phone and heâs edging me off the sidewalk. The light turns green. I step off and I realize everyone crossing the street is on a cell phone but me. And they donât see me. I have to move to avoid being walked over. In other words, Iâm the only one who is actually here. Everyone else is somewhere else. Something is wrong. Someone is out of step. Wait a moment, itâs me.
Marshall McLuhan (1964 age 52). Obviously.
âThe telephone is an irresistible intruder in time or place.â
Me again (September, 2010, age 58). Especially now.
Here is Rudy Giuliani getting a lesson on the irresistible power of the telephone as he delivers a speech.
Cordially, Marshall and Me
Reading
Marshall McLuhan, Understanding Media, 1964, p. 271.
Tags: Acoustic, Communications, Conversation, Culture, Electronic media, Listening, Relationship, Technology, Thinking
Me (September, 2010, age 58). Really!
Everyone knows Marshall McLuhan said âthe medium is the message.â But hardly anyone understands what he meant by it.
Are you ready for it? New media change the way we perceive the world. How? Because they change the way we sense the world. With our perceptions changed the world becomes a different place.
So what? Your children, being shaped by different media than the media that shaped you, are entirely different creatures and live in an entirely different world. But you knew that already didnât you?
Marshall McLuhan (1977 age 65/66). We’re re-tribalising!
Boom! Boom! Boom go the drums! [Be patient this 8 minute video is well worth it]
Cordially, Marshall and Me
Reading
Marshall McLuhan, The Medium is the Massage, 1967.
Tags: Conversation, Electronic media, Hot and cool media, Medium is the message, Relationship, Technology, Understanding media
Marshall McLuhan (1964, age 52). Here are two short lists.
Three things that havenât worked in America since the coming of TV:
Movies
National magazines
Comic books
And two things that thanks to TV Americans have discovered a new passion for:
Skin diving
Small cars.
Me (August, 2010, age 58). Now what?
I wonder if itâs too late to make a call to my broker?
Cordially, Marshall and Me
Reading
Marshall McLuhan, Understanding Media, 1964, pp. 417 and 421.
Tags: Business, Conversation, Culture, Electronic media, Entertainment, Movies, Technology, Television
Me (August, 2010, age 58). McLuhan in conversation (continued)
Yesterday we left Marshall in conversation with journalist Herb Caen at a topless restaurant in San Francisco in August 1965. Readers will recall that McLuhan had called attention to the visual bias of Caenâs language. Letâs take one more look â sorry, I apologize for my visual orientation – at that exchange. Here, to refresh your memory is their conversation from yesterday:
[Caen] Being President of the Leg Men of America, I never felt a primal urge to lunch among the topless ladies, but in such distinguished company who could resist? âStrip steak sandwich,â I said to waitress Marilyn, who was wearing blue sequin pasties and not much else. As she walked away, I commented âA good-looking girl.
[McLuhan] Interesting choice of words. Good-LOOKING girl. The remark of a man who is visually oriented, not tactually. And I further noticed that you could not bring yourself to look at her breasts as she took your order. You examined her only after she walked away â another example of the visual: the further she walked away, the more attractive she became.
Question:Â What do you think Caen said next:
(a)Â Â Â âIf you say so Marshall.â
(b)Â Â âFascinating, I never noticed – look Iâve done it again – my visual orientation.â
(c)Â Â Â âWhat?â
(d)Â Â âActually, Iâm rather inhibited.â
Marshall McLuhan (August 1965, age 54) The answer is âŚ
Of course (d) â which, if memory serves me, I followed up with:
Another interesting word. Inhibited is the opposite of exhibited, and what is exhibited causes you to be inhibited.
Cordially, Marshall and Me
Reading
Herb Caen, âRainy Day Session,â San Francisco Chronicle, August 12, 1965, p. 25.
Tags: Communications, Conversation, Culture, Humour, Visual perspective, Visual thinking
Me (August, 2010, age 58). McLuhan in conversation.
Forty-five years ago, in August 1965, McLuhan was in San Francisco to take part in the Marshall McLuhan Festival organized by the PR team of Howard Gossage and Gerald Feigen, who had organized the event to build McLuhan as a public figure.  One day they took McLuhan for lunch at a topless restaurant  along with journalists Tom Wolfe and Herb Caen. In the article Caen wrote about the outing he reports this exchange between himself and McLuhan:
Being President of the Leg Men of America, I never felt a primal urge to lunch among the topless ladies, but in such distinguished company who could resist? âStrip steak sandwich,â I said to waitress Marilyn, who was wearing blue sequin pasties and not much else. As she walked away, I commented âA good-looking girl.â
Question:Â What do you think McLuhan said next?
(a)Â Â Â âShe certainly is.â
(b)Â Â âI hear you Herb.â
(c)Â Â Â âExcuse me, Marilyn, Iâll have the strip steak too.â
(d)  âInteresting choice of words. Good-LOOKING girl. The remark of a man who is visually oriented, not tactually.â
Marshall McLuhan (August 1965, age 54). The answer is âŚ
Of course (d) – I have little in the way of small talk.  And, if memory serves me, after I said that I said this:
And I further noticed that you could not bring yourself to look at her breasts as she took your order. You examined her only after she walked away â another example of the visual: the further she walked away, the more attractive she became.
Cordially, Marshall and Me
Reading
Herb Caen, âRainy Day Session,â San Francisco Chronicle, August 12, 1965, p. 25.
Tags: Communications, Conversation, Humour, Visual perspective, Visual thinking
Marshall McLuhan (1959-1967). The Monday Night Seminar.
Monday nights I like to hold an informal seminar to discuss the breakthroughs we are making in understanding media and think things through. Someone asked me if we shouldnât have some sort of admission requirements or selection criteria. I said certainly not, requirements and criteria will only serve to reduce the intelligence of the group.
Me (August, 2010, age 58). Pure speculation
Actually I donât know if Marshall McLuhan said any such thing. What he says, here, I must admit, is more purely my invention than is traditional on From Marshall and Me. And for this lack of discipline I apologize. Yet I imagine this is something McLuhan might have said given his views on the problems created by specialization in academia. At any rate judging by the remarkable diversity of the people who took part in the Monday Night Seminars he clearly welcomed and encouraged the participation of people from widely different backgrounds and with widely different interests.
For example, here is a list of the participants who attended one Monday night in 1967, as recalled by Bob Rodgers, who at the time was a graduate student in English at Toronto and a next door neighbor of McLuhanâs on Wells Hill Avenue: an anthropologist (Ted Carpenter), three beatniks, a young man with a guitar, an Eagle Scout, an academic couple (Wilfred and Sheila Watson), a man in advertising, a CBC news announcer (Stanley Burke), a magician, a fortune teller, an Inuit carver, a wrestler (Whipper Billy Watson), and three graduate students. I donât know how smart this group turned out to be, but the conversation was undoubtedly stimulating.
And, as those of you have been following this blog know, I was at University of Toronto in the 70s. Wish I’d gone.
Cordially, âMarshallâ and Me
Reading
Bob Rogers, âIn the Garden with the Guru,â Literary Review of Canada, January 1, 2008
Tags: Communications, Conversation, Creating, Culture, Education, Entertainment, Learning, Listening
Marshall McLuhan (1965, age 66). Of course itâs obvious âŚ
âWhat do you think, Marshall? At the same time as we are chatting here, just the six of us,* Americaâs biggest communication conference, led by S. I. Hayakawa, the semanticist, is meeting across town at the San Francisco Hilton with over 1,000 people in attendance.â
âObviously, itâs unimportant. In the time it takes to get a 1,000 people to agree on anything conditions will have changed. With the conditions changed the conversation will be pointless. Theyâll be meeting for the wrong reasons on the wrong questions. Under electronic conditions of high speed change this is inevitable.â
(*Tom Wolfe, Howard Gossage, Gerald Feigen, Mike Robbins, Herbert Gold, and Edward Keating.)
Me (July, 2010, age 57). Â What should be done?
As usual McLuhanâs wiseguy banter raises serious questions. Under electronic conditions of high speed change are large conferences likely to be a waste of time. A disquieting thought given the number and size of such conferences that continue to be held today.
Is McLuhan right on this one? What is your view? Are large meetings inevitably focused on the wrong things? If so, what forms and methods for holding conferences are likely to be most effective? Is the âunconferenceâ the meeting of the future?
Cordially, Marshall and Me
Reading for this post
Tom Wolfe. âWhat if he is right,â in McLuhan: Hot and Cool, 1967, pp. 44-45.
Tags: Business, Communications, Conversation, Relationship
Marshall McLuhan (1965/66, age 53-55?). In conversation with Howard Gossage.
âMarshall, will you listen for a second?â
âWhy?â
âBecause I have something to say.â
âWell, say it then.â
âThatâs what Iâve been trying to do.â
âWellâ
âWell what?â
âIâve forgotten.â
Me (June 2010, age 57).  How bad was McLuhan as a listener?
It is agreed that McLuhan was a polite but not a good listener. (The story being that he always waited for your lips to stop moving before he began speaking.) Howard Gossage, who knew McLuhan well, says that while McLuhan was a bad listener McLuhan did have friends who were worse than he was. For example, Gossage says that Buckminster Fuller, who was profoundly deaf, and often turned off his hearing aid, was the worst listener in McLuhanâs wider circle. On one occasion, Gossage says, Fuller stopped him in mid-sentence with the question, âDo you want an answer or donât you? Very well, [said Gossage.]â Fuller then proceeded to give him an answer. One problem, it wasnât the answer to the question that he had been discussing. But then all Fuller had promised him was âan answerâ not âthe answer.â
The price of poor listening seems obvious. What is the benefit?
Cordially, Marshall and Me
Reading for this post
Howard Luck Gossage, âYou can see why the mighty would be curious,â in McLuhan: Hot and Cool, 1969, footnote, p. 24.
Tags: Communications, Conversation, Listening, Relationship, Rhetoric
Marshall McLuhan (1967, age 65/66). In conversation with Howard Gossage
âMarshall,â said Howard Gossage, âtell me something. Do you have to be such a maddening writer?â
âWhat do you mean?â
âWell, Iâll be reading along and at first itâs great. âI find that [my] ⌠independently arrived at theories not only are confirmed by, but fit neatly into [your] ⌠far broader structure, it is very heady stuff indeed. And then wham. You hit me with one of your probes. Something that requires 5,000 words of explanation and you give me none.”
âHoward, if I stopped to explain everything I said Iâd never get anywhere, besides there has to be something for the reader to do.â
Me (June 2010, age 57).  So whatâs a man, or a woman, to do?
Perhaps the only thing you can do when you hit a probe [a question or statement designed to stimulate thought or insight] is to grin and then decide whether or not to do your work.
Here are some McLuhan probes:
People will not accept war on TV. They will accept war in movies. They will accept it in newspapers. Nobody will accept war on TV. It is too close. (1973)
The ideal show on pay TV would be a great composer rehearsing a symphony, not playing his symphony. (1967)
The TV image is the first technology to project or externalize our tactile sense. (1961)
TV is a service medium only during a crisis. (1970)
The TV as a today show is a continuous present. There are really no dates. (1971)
Do any of these probes still âmaddenâ? What if in each one the word âTVâ were replaced by âInternetâ or âFaceBookâ?
Cordially, Marshall and Me
Reading for this post
Howard Luck Gossage, âYou can see why the mighty would be curious.â In McLuhan: Hot and Cool.
Probes: Eric McLuhan and Frank Zingrone, Essential McLuhan, 1995, pp. 294-295.
Tags: American mind, Communications, Conversation, Creating, Criticism, Learning, Listening, Movies, Rhetoric, Television, Thinking
Marshall McLuhan (December 13, 1977, age 66). Iâm stunned!
Peter Gzowski actually suggested on television today that I had failed grade six! The fact is – as told him – âI never failed any grade ever.â
Me (June 2010, age 57). Â What was McLuhan up to?
What Gzowski asked was whether ordinary people who hadnât attained McLuhanâs academic stature (Full Professor Toronto, Cambridge Ph.D.) should be able to feel better knowing that McLuhan had failed grade six. An easy question. At least one would think so. At any rate, McLuhanâs response clearly surprised Gzowski.
Why did McLuhan deny heâd failed? It is a fact that he did fail. And you can read about it in the biographies of McLuhan by Philip Marchand and Terry Gordon. It is also a fact that his Mother persuaded the school to let him go on to grade 7 and prove he could do the work, which he did. So why didnât McLuhan say this? What was McLuhan up to?
Cordially, Marshall and Me
PS:Â For something completely different see yesterday’s post
Reading for this post
W. Terrence Gordon. Marshall McLuhan: Escape into Understanding, 1997, p. 10.
Philip Marchand, Marshall Mcluhan: the Medium and the Messenger, 1989, p. 17-18.
Tags: Communications, Conversation, Education, Personal branding