A tribute to and a lament for Marshall McLuhan continues. If he had lived Marshall would have been 100 on July 21, 2011. Join me in the countdown to his centennial, and an exploration of more of his observations on the way media work in the electric age in which we live.
Celebrity
McLuhan is back, but for how long?
Marshall McLuhan is news once again. Today is the second day of McLuhan week in Toronto. And for at least this week all things McLuhan will seem fresh. Especially on Thursday, July 21, which is McLuhan’s 100th birthday. What would McLuhan have thought of the celebrations? Probably very little. He had work to do.Â
Here is a post I wrote on McLuhan and celebrity you may want to take a peek at again.
Cordially Me
Who was Marshall McLuhan?
Marshall McLuhan (September 20, 1976, age 65). Who am I?
âYou see, Iâm a sleuth, a kind of Sherlock Holmes character who simply investigates the environment and reports exactly what he sees. Strangely enough some people are actually frightened by me. I find the whole exploration of the environment very exciting. Once you decide to become an explorer, thereâs no place to stop. Iâm like Columbus. I discover new worlds everywhere I look.â
Me (February, 2011, age 58). So who was he? A Sherlock or a Columbus?
Cordially, Marshall and Me
Reading:
Barbara Rowes, âIf the Media Didnât Get Marshall McLuhanâs Message in the â60s, Another is on the Way,â People Magazine, Vol. 6, No. 12, September 20, 1976.
Looking for Marshall McLuhan
Me (December 4, 2010, age 58). Are you there, Marshall?
Two weeks ago I was in Toronto and stopped in to have a drink in the bar of the Sutton Place, on Bay Street, a few minuteâs walk from Marshall McLuhanâs old offices – the Coach House – at St. Michaelâs College at the University of Toronto.
I did so because I knew McLuhan liked to have a drink at the Sutton Place, it was cold and I thought I might still pick up a memory of him, and my wife knowing this might be on my mind suggested it. The roof-top bar McLuhan liked at the Hotel is now closed, but one of the waiters, Frank, who has worked in the hotel for over 30 years said he remembered serving McLuhan.
What did he drink? After some time he recalled. St Jovain, a white Bourdeaux.
Not Scotch? No, white wine, St. Jovain.
And that was that. He could remember nothing else.
This I think is as good a place as any to leave McLuhan on this the 300th post in this blog, not with a breakthrough in media studies, but drinking white wine, looking out over the city he knew so well, for so long. Wondering, perhaps, whether this was as good as it got, and if so whether that wouldnât be all that bad âŚ
Cordially, Me
P.S.   Thanks to all of you who read From Marshall and Me.  And my thanks especially to the following people who in many different ways, small and large, helped to make series 1 a success:  Debbie, Ramon, David, Julien, Michelle, Michael, Mitch, Tara, Jose, and Alex.
P.P.S. Â See next week for the start of the next series of posts of this blog that will look for McLuhan and take us intoMcLuhanâs centennial.
In a day everything can change.
Marshall McLuhan (10 am, November 25, 1967, age 56). Dear Diary:
Not long now. Corinne says the operationâs set for just before noon. The wait is killing me. Iâd give anything to put it off for another week, but then Iâd have to suffer through another week of being poked and prodded by the good doctors at the Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center.  They say Iâve got a tumor the size of my fist lodged under my brain. And the damn thingâs got to come out. If it doesnât over the next few months Iâll die, horribly, blind and insane. When they started to tell me what they were going to do, where the knife would go, I started screaming. I couldnât listen. Just to hear the details is appalling. Quite frankly, Iâm terrified.
Me (November, 2010, age 58). A happy ending? Dear God, Iâd like to think so:
But, as I’ve said before,  I believe something special was taken away from McLuhan that day in New York City:  His genius. The good news is he survived the long operation, which his doctors declared a success, and lived another 13 years. The bad news is that it is doubtful that he was ever again the man he once was. His memory muddied, his temper irritable, his energy sapped, his mind inflexible, his senses painfully acute, never again would he write a book alone, or come up with a new idea that was not simply a recycling of an idea developed in the 1950s and early 1960s translated into new words. Always eccentric he became a darker parody of himself. This is a harsher view than typically prevails in the literature on McLuhan.  It is harsher largely because of what I discovered quite by chance while looking into his surgery.  A world-class neurosurgeon I interviewed about McLuhanâs operation told me that there is no question that his genius would have suffered. Forgive me for saying this, he told me, or words to this effect, if your business is swinging a hammer, you could return to work after this kind of operation. But for a man like McLuhan whose business was the flash of his mind he could never go back and do what he had once done.
This may be hard to watch, but you may want to see what McLuhan had to go through and what new approaches are now being pioneered:
Cordially, Marshall and Me
Reading
Marshall McLuhan, Understanding Media, 1964, p. 211-213.
The celebrity of Marshall McLuhan
Marshall McLuhan (1964, age 52). The Sixties.
âCorinne?â
âYes, Marshall.â
âDonât you think it odd there is so little about this decade that appeals to me and yet so much about me that appeals to it?
âDo you think?â
âIndeed I do.â
Me (November, 2010, age 58). What is it about the Sixties and McLuhan?
In 1965 anyone who watched TV, read a magazine or looked at a newspaper had heard of Marshall McLuhan. Why was he such a celebrity in this decade? It is hard to shake off the idea that there was something about the Sixties that prepared people to be drawn to Marshall McLuhan. But what was it?
As far as the counter-culture is concerned perhaps it helped to be on drugs to truly appreciate the delights of Understanding Media. Dig this. A scarcity of papyrus brought down the Roman Empire. Far out man.
Cordially, Marshall and Me
Reading
Marshall McLuhan, Understanding Media, 1964, practically any page.
John and Yoko and Marshall McLuhanâs theory of dinosaurs
Me (September, 2010, age 58). Perhaps the most insane of McLuhanâs ideas
In 1969 on the last Saturday before Christmas CBS television arranged for Marshall McLuhan to interview John Lennon and Yoko Ono about their âWar is Overâ campaign and anything else McLuhan thought they should talk about. Their wide-ranging discussion took place at Marshallâs office in the Coach House at the University of Toronto and lasted about an hour. Among other things, they talked about the importance of Elvis in Johnâs career, Yokoâs contribution to their creative partnership, the cultural differences between Britain and America, and, of course, McLuhanâs explanation for the extinction of the dinosaurs. I donât know what John and Yoko thought of McLuhanâs ideas about the dinosaurs, but it must have crossed their minds that this was one seriously crazy dude. And if so it would be difficult to say they were wrong.
Marshall McLuhan (19 December 1969, age 58). Itâs the frustration!
âFrustration creates bigness. Frustration releases adrenaline in the system. Adrenaline creates much bigger muscles and bigger arms and legs ⌠. This is why dinosaurs ended in sudden death, because as the environment became more and more hostile, more and more adrenaline was released into their bodies and they got bigger and bigger and then they collapsed.â
Â
Cordially, Marshall and Me
Â
Read a ‘transcript’ of the interview between John Lennon and Marshall McLuhan
Â
Whatâs the good word?
Marshall McLuhan (1973, age 61-62). âDad, youâre in the dictionary!â
âOf course Iâm in the dictionary, Eric, Iâm looking up a word. Here it is, âcornicheâ from the French â âa road along the edge of a cliff.â Exactly where we are today, literally and metaphorically, donât you think?
âNo Dad, I donât mean youâre using the dictionary, I mean youâre actually in it. There are now words based on you. âMcLuhanism,â McLuhanize,â âMcLuhanite,â and get this âMcLuhanesque.â
âWell thatâs vurry satisfying. Northrop Frye isnât in the dictionary is he? But hold on, which dictionary? the Oxford?â
âNo, The Barnhart Dictionary of New English Since 1963, first edition, 1973.â
âWhat a shame. Iâd have preferred the Oxford. After all, it is the Dictionary.â
Me (August, 2010, age 58). McLuhan would have been pleased
McLuhan did make it into the second edition of the Oxford English Dictionary, which was published in 1989. Unfortunately he did not live to see it. However, it is safe to say that he would undoubtedly have taken great pride in this mark of the power of his influence on what he considered to be the most powerful of all mediums, our language.
Cordially, Marshall and Me
Â
Reading
The Oxford English Dictionary, second edition, 1989.
How to know if youâre a celebrity
Marshall McLuhan (October 1970, age 59). They name a cocktail after you
Marshall, look at this! A Mr. and Mrs. Greg Frasier of San Francisco have written you to say theyâve named a cocktail after you.
For heaven sake, Corinne, whatâs it called?
The âMcLuhan Cocktail,â of course. Hereâs the recipe. âIngredients: 1 oz. Irish whiskey; ½ oz. dry Vermouth; Âź oz. sweet Vermouth; Fresh lime twist. Combine ingredients and stir gently with cracked ice. Strain into a chilled cocktail glass. Add twist of lime.â They say itâs âa cool cocktail for the entire global village. With the McLuhan, the mixture is the message.â
Me (August, 2010, age 58). Indeed they did.
The âMcLuhan Cocktail,â celebrating Marshallâs Irish roots, appears in the Zodiac Cookbook, 1970, which was sent to McLuhan as a gift. The letter accompanying the cookbook explains:
“Enclosed is a copy of the ZODIAC COOKBOOK by my wife and myself, which we hope you will accept with our compliments. Your attention is drawn to page 27.
I am a graduate student in broadcasting at San Francisco State College, and as such became interested in your writings. I wanted to give you a copy of the book personally at your recent lecture on October 18 at the University of San Francisco, but you left so quickly I didnât get the chance.
We hope you and your wife enjoy our book â the McLuhan.
Bon appĂŠtit!
Greg Frazier”
Perhaps the best way to appreciate the extent of McLuhanâs celebrity in the late 1960s and the animosity that celebrity caused him today is to make yourself a pitcher of “McLuhans”. It is difficult to imagine a professor today, at Toronto or anywhere else, being an inspiration for a cocktail.
Cordially, Marshall and Me
Reading
Philip Marchand, Marshall McLuhan: The Medium and the Message, 1989, 231.
